- HOME
- INTRO TO THE FORUM
- USE AND MISUSE
- BADLY WRITTEN, BADLY SPOKEN
- GETTING
TO KNOW ENGLISH - PREPARING FOR ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TESTS
- GOING DEEPER INTO ENGLISH
- YOU ASKED ME THIS QUESTION
- EDUCATION AND TEACHING FORUM
- ADVICE AND DISSENT
- MY MEDIA ENGLISH WATCH
- STUDENTS' SOUNDING BOARD
- LANGUAGE HUMOR AT ITS FINEST
- THE LOUNGE
- NOTABLE WORKS BY OUR VERY OWN
- ESSAYS BY JOSE CARILLO
- Why Is The Sentence “It Can Be Overcame” Grammatically Wrong?
- How Finite Verbs Differ From Non-Finite Verbs
- The Need To Avoid Officious Stock Phrases When Writing Or Speaking
- Sounding Profound By Quoting Someone Without Attribution
- Why We Need to Hyphenate Certain Compound Modifiers
- Let’s Come To Grips With The Proper Use Of“However”Once And For All
- ABOUT JOSE CARILLO
- READINGS ABOUT LANGUAGE
- TIME OUT FROM ENGLISH GRAMMAR
- NEWS AND COMMENTARY
- BOOKSHOP
- ARCHIVES
READINGS IN LANGUAGE
This new section features links to interesting, instructive, or thought-provoking readings about the English language. The selections could be anywhere from light and humorous to serious and scholarly, and they range widely from the reading, writing, listening, and speaking disciplines to the teaching and learning of English.
Getting used to the QWERTY keyboard’s eventual demise
Shall we soon finally see the demise of the QWERTY keyboard—that 136-year-old artifact of the predigital world that has defined the way users of the English language envision and feel words in space? In “The Promise and Peril of ‘Smart’ Keyboards,” an article she wrote for the August 13, 2010 issue of The New York Times, Virginia Heffernan says that this might happen sooner than we think.
Heffernan bases this personal forecast on her recent observation that although the QWERTY layout still appears in nearly all English-language computer hardware keyboards, “smartphones and tablet devices with touch-screen keypads (like the Android and the iPhone) now default to a layout that looks like qwerty but doesn’t work like qwerty at all.” This, she says, “will be good news to many designers who believe that bullheaded commitment to qwerty is holding up a revolution in interface design that should have started with the touch screen.”
As she ponders the likely demise of the QWERTY keyboard, Heffernan muses: “Who knows what qwerty has done to the language — even to modes of thought — by attaching meaning to certain constellations? Deep in our typist-minds, G and H are centrally located and somehow siblings; X and Z are southwestern outliers; and Q is always followed by . . . W.” Then, on a personal note, she recalls her own excitement and unease over the shift to what she calls a “gut-renovated qwerty.”
Read Virginia Heffernan’s “The Promise and Peril of ‘Smart’ Keyboards” in The New York Times now!
RELATED READING:
In “The Internet: Is it changing the way we think?”, John Naughton of The Observer in the UK offers his comments and has put together the opinions of eight writers and experts on the subject, namely Sarah Churchwell, academic and critic; Naomi Alderman, novelist; Ed Bullmore, psychiatrist; Geoff Dyer, writer; Colin Blakemore, neurobiologist; Ian Goodyer, psychiatrist; Maryanne Wolf, cognitive neuroscientist; and Bidisha, writer and critic. They are responding to the provocative claim of Nicholas Carr in his book The Shallows: How the Internet is Changing the Way We Think, Read and Remember that the Internet is not only shaping our lives but physically altering our brains as well.
Read John Naughton’s “The internet: is it changing the way we think?” in The Observer now!
Click to read comments or post a comment
View the complete list of postings in this section
(requires registration to post)
