- HOME
- INTRO TO THE FORUM
- USE AND MISUSE
- BADLY WRITTEN, BADLY SPOKEN
- GETTING
TO KNOW ENGLISH - PREPARING FOR ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TESTS
- GOING DEEPER INTO ENGLISH
- YOU ASKED ME THIS QUESTION
- EDUCATION AND TEACHING FORUM
- ADVICE AND DISSENT
- MY MEDIA ENGLISH WATCH
- STUDENTS' SOUNDING BOARD
- LANGUAGE HUMOR AT ITS FINEST
- THE LOUNGE
- NOTABLE WORKS BY OUR VERY OWN
- ESSAYS BY JOSE CARILLO
- Long Noun Forms Make Sentences Exasperatingly Difficult To Grasp
- Good Conversationalists Phrase Their Tag Questions With Finesse
- The Pronoun “None” Can Mean Either “Not One” Or “Not Any”
- A Rather Curious State Of Affairs In The Grammar Of “Do”-Questions
- Why I Consistently Use The Serial Comma
- Misuse Of “Lie” And “Lay” Punctures Many Writers’ Command Of English
- ABOUT JOSE CARILLO
- READINGS ABOUT LANGUAGE
- TIME OUT FROM ENGLISH GRAMMAR
- NEWS AND COMMENTARY
- BOOKSHOP
- ARCHIVES
TIME OUT FROM ENGLISH GRAMMAR
This section features wide-ranging, thought-provoking articles in English on any subject under the sun. Its objective is to present new, mind-changing ideas as well as to show to serious students of English how the various tools of the language can be felicitously harnessed to report a momentous or life-changing finding or event, to espouse or oppose an idea, or to express a deeply felt view about the world around us.
The outstanding English-language expositions to be featured here will mostly be presented through links to the websites that carry them. To put a particular work in better context, links to critiques, biographical sketches, and various other material about the author and his or her works will usually be also provided.
To be understood when writing about science, to lie is often a must
For someone to be understood when writing about science, he or she has to lie.
This is the playful but dead serious thesis of Lawrence Maxwell Krauss, an American theoretical physicist, in “The Lies of Science Writing,” an essay he wrote for the December 4, 2010 issue of Wall Street Journal.
“I don’t mean lie in the sense of intentionally misleading people,” Krauss says. “I mean that because math is the language of science, scientists who want to translate their work into popular parlance have to use verbal or pictorial metaphors that are necessarily inexact.”
Krauss cites as an example the famous “selfish gene” metaphor used by the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins: “This is a brilliant and simple way to explain that natural selection relies on the self-perpetuation of genes that promote higher rates of survival. But for some critics, it suggests an intentionality that is absent in the process of evolution. Others worry that it implies an immoral world where selfishness wins out.”
But even with such reservations against metaphors, Krauss doesn’t rule out their use in explaining science: “When used effectively, an apt metaphor can enhance the real purpose in writing about science for the public: provoking interest and a desire to learn more. Good teaching, after all, is really a matter of seduction. You have to tailor your material to win your audience’s attention.”
Read Lawrence Krauss’s “The Lies of Science Writing” in the Wall Street Journal now!
RELATED READING:
In “10 Ways to Get the Most Out of Technology,” an article he wrote for the December 29, 2010 issue of The New York Times, Sam Grobart makes some easily doable—and mostly free—things to do to improve your technological life. “Altogether, they should take about two hours,” he says. “If you do them, those two hours will pay off handsomely in both increased free time and diminished anxiety and frustration.”
Read Sam Grobart’s “10 Ways to Get the Most Out of Technology” in The New York Times now!
