- HOME
- INTRO TO THE FORUM
- USE AND MISUSE
- BADLY WRITTEN, BADLY SPOKEN
- GETTING
TO KNOW ENGLISH - PREPARING FOR ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TESTS
- GOING DEEPER INTO ENGLISH
- YOU ASKED ME THIS QUESTION
- EDUCATION AND TEACHING FORUM
- ADVICE AND DISSENT
- MY MEDIA ENGLISH WATCH
- STUDENTS' SOUNDING BOARD
- LANGUAGE HUMOR AT ITS FINEST
- THE LOUNGE
- NOTABLE WORKS BY OUR VERY OWN
- ESSAYS BY JOSE CARILLO
- Let’s Come To Grips With The Proper Use Of“However”Once And For All
- How English Makes Do To Evoke The Sense Of The Past Imperfect
- When It Greatly Matters What English Accent We've Acquired
- A Potent Tool For Whittling Down Complex Sentences Into Simple Ones
- A Unified Approach To The Proper Use Of Punctuation In English
- A Unified Approach To The Proper Use Of Punctuation In English - II
- ABOUT JOSE CARILLO
- READINGS ABOUT LANGUAGE
- TIME OUT FROM ENGLISH GRAMMAR
- NEWS AND COMMENTARY
- BOOKSHOP
- ARCHIVES
ADVICE AND DISSENT
This section features discussions on education, learning and teaching, and language with particular focus on English. The primary subjects to be taken up here are notable advocacies and contrary viewpoints in these disciplines and their allied fields. Our primary aim is to clarify matters and issues of importance to language and learning, provide intelligent and useful instruction, promote rational and critical thinking, and enhance the individual’s overall capacity for discernment.
Don’t be hoodwinked by numbers, for they may carry big untruths
Are you dazzled into instant submission by numbers? You shouldn’t be, says Charles Seife, a veteran science writer who teaches journalism at New York University. In his recently released book, Proofiness: The Dark Arts of Mathematical Deception (Viking Adult, 204 pages), Seife argues that numbers aren’t really the supposedly cold, hard, and objective things that don’t lie; in fact, he says, they are very often used to justify false information, foist half-truths, and hoodwink the public into believing almost anything.
According to Seife, “proofiness” is the art of using pure mathematics for impure ends, like bringing down competent and trustworthy government officials so they can be replaced with undeserving ones, convicting the innocent and acquitting the guilty, ruining national economies, and fixing the outcomes of elections. “Our society is now awash in proofiness,” Seife says in the book. “Using a few powerful techniques, thousands of people are crafting mathematical falsehoods to get you to swallow untruths…When you learn to shovel proofiness out of the way, some of the most controversial topics become simple and straightforward.”
In “Fibbing with Numbers,” a book review of Seife’s Proofiness in the September 17, 2010 issue of The New York Times, Cornell University applied mathematics professor Steven Strogatz says that more than a math book, Proofiness is an eye-opening civics lesson that “reveals the truly corrosive effects on a society awash in numerical mendacity.”
Read an excerpt from Charles Seife’s Proofiness in The New York Times now!
Read Steven Strogatz’s review of Proofiness in The New York Times now!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Charles Seife, an American author and journalist, is currently associate professor in journalism at New York University. He had done freelance work for New Scientist, Scientific American, The Economist, Science, Wired UK, and The Sciences and has written five books, namely Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea, Alpha & Omega: The Search for the Beginning and End of the Universe, Decoding The Universe, Sun in a Bottle: The Strange History of Fusion and the Science of Wishful Thinking, and the latest, Proofiness: The Dark Arts of Mathematical Deception. He has an undergraduate degree from Princeton University, an M.S. in mathematics from Yale University, and a M.S. in journalism from Columbia University.
Click to read responses or post a response
View the complete list of postings in this section
(requires registration to view & post)
