- HOME
- ENGLISH FORUM
- BADLY WRITTEN, BADLY SPOKEN
- GETTING
TO KNOW ENGLISH - POUR OUT YOUR MIND IN ENGLISH
- GOING DEEPER INTO ENGLISH
- YOU ASKED ME THIS QUESTION
- EDUCATION AND TEACHING FORUM
- ADVICE AND DISSENT
- MY MEDIA ENGLISH WATCH
- NOTABLE WORKS BY OUR VERY OWN
- ESSAYS BY JOSE CARILLO
- ABOUT JOSE CARILLO
- TIME OUT FROM ENGLISH GRAMMAR
- NEWS AND COMMENTARY
- BOOKSHOP
- ARCHIVES
ADVICE AND DISSENT
This section features discussions on education, learning and teaching, and language with particular focus on English. The primary subjects to be taken up here are notable advocacies and contrary viewpoints in these disciplines and their allied fields. Our primary aim is to clarify matters and issues of importance to language and learning, provide intelligent and useful instruction, promote rational and critical thinking, and enhance the individual’s overall capacity for discernment.
Critic says Google’s Book Search “a disaster for scholars”
With its ambitious goal of putting up the world’s largest digital library, Google’s Book Search has been heralded as the ultimate information resource for scholarly research. But Geoffrey Nunberg, an American linguist and information professor at the University of California at Berkeley, contends that as of today, Google’s Book Search is a veritable disaster for scholars. In an article written for the August 31, 2009 issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education, Nunberg says “it’s so disappointing that the book search’s metadata are a train wreck: a mishmash wrapped in a muddle wrapped in a mess.”
He cites the following as among the major pitfalls in Google’s Book Search:
—The endemic misdatings of the publication year of books, such that the major works of certain authors published decades or even centuries earlier or later—among them Stephen King, Virginia Woolf, Raymond Chandler, and Dorothy Parker—are all listed under the year 1899.
—Many absurd classification errors, among which is H.L. Mencken’s The American Language being classified under “Family & Relationships,” a French edition of Hamlet and a Japanese edition of Madame Bovary being both classified under “Antiques and Collectibles,” and an edition of Herman Melvile’s Moby Dick being classified under “Computers.”
—Numerous entries that mix up the names of authors, editors, and writers of introductions, such as the attribution “Madame Bovary By Henry James” for a page from an edition of a French book (the true author is Gustave Flaubert), and the attribution to Sigmund Freud and Katherine Jones of a book entitled “The Mosaic Navigator: The Essential Guide to the Internet Interface.”
Nunberg suggests that if Google doesn’t want its ambitious book digitization project to become a running scholarly joke, the company should make every effort now to rectify these weaknesses of Google’s Book Search. And he is hopeful that the company can do this fast. After all, he says, “If recent history teaches us anything, it’s that Google is a very quick study.”Read Geoffrey Nunberg’s “Google's Book Search: A Disaster for Scholars” now!
View the complete list of postings in this section
(requires registration to view & post)
