Author Topic: Consequence of Double Negatives  (Read 3201 times)

Miss Mae

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 479
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Email
Consequence of Double Negatives
« on: January 13, 2013, 03:28:44 PM »
I'm often fascinated by how a double negative construction can bring home a point. But is there a "rule" in using that?

Joe Carillo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4656
  • Karma: +207/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Consequence of Double Negatives
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2013, 10:47:06 PM »
A double negative construction happens when we negate a so-called affixal negation, or positive words  that are negated by the affixes “un-”, “im-”/“in-”/“il-”, “dis-”, “de-”, and “-less,” as in “unavailable,” “imperfect,” “inelastic,” “illegal,” “disregard,” “decamp,” or “worthless.” If our intention is to use a statement using affixal negation, we must see to it that the words “no,” “not,” or “never” isn’t used to negate it. For instance, the sentence “It is not immoral to steal” is a grammatically incorrect double negative whose sense is exactly the opposite, “It is moral to steal.”

Miss Mae

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 479
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Consequence of Double Negatives
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2013, 01:07:46 PM »
Thank you for that, Sir! ;)