Told with dry wit laced with modern insights in brain science and sociology, David Brook’s
The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement (Random House, 448 pages) is an engaging case study of how the unconscious mind shapes the way modern-day people live and relate to other people. It chronicles the life cycle of a fictional couple in the United States, Harold and Erica, from their formative years all the way to their subsequent meeting and courtship, marriage, family life, and pursuit of their respective careers.
Brooks, an op-columnist of
The New York Times who writes on the social sciences and psychology, uses Harold and Erica’s life story to buttress his personal theories about social behavior, particularly (1) that reason is often subverted by genetically ingrained emotions and biases, (2) that social problems can be solved not by money but by cultural remedies, and (3) that the class divide is created not by money or power but by intelligence, deportment, and personal taste.
“This is not a science book,” says Brooks about
The Social Animal, which has been in the US bestseller list since its publication last March. “I don’t answer how the brain does things. I try to answer what it all means. I try to explain how these findings about the deepest recesses of our minds should change the way we see ourselves, raise our kids, conduct business, teach, manage our relationships and practice politics. This story is based on scientific research, but it is really about emotion, character, virtue and love.”
Reviewing
The Social Animal for Amazon.com, Walter Isaacson, CEO of the Aspen Institute and former chairman of CNN, says that Brooks “has written an absolutely fascinating book about how we form our emotions and character” and that the book’s exploration of the workings of the unconscious mind “makes the recent revolution in neuroscience understandable.” On the other hand, New York University philosophy professor Thomas Nagel, reviewing
The Social Animal for
The New York Times, describes the book as “really a moral and social tract.” He observes that Brooks lacks the ability to create characters that compel belief, such that Harold and Erika don’t come to life despite the author’s earnest attempt to describe their psychological depths. “They and their supporting cast are [just] mannequins for the display of psychological and social generalizations,” Nagel says.
Read David Brooks’s essay “How the new sciences of human nature can help make sense of a life” in
NewYorker.com now!
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/01/17/110117fa_fact_brooksRead Walter Isaacson’s review of David Brooks’s
The Social Animal in
Amazon.com now!
http://www.amazon.com/Social-Animal-Sources-Character-Achievement/dp/140006760XRead Thomas Nagel’s “David Brooks’s Theory of Human Nature” in
The New York Times now!
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/13/books/review/book-review-the-social-animal-by-david-brooks.htmlABOUT THE AUTHOR:David Brooks is a Canadian-born political and cultural commentator who writes an op-ed column on the social sciences and psychology for
The New York Times. He has been a senior editor at
The Weekly Standard and a contributing editor at
Newsweek and the
Atlantic Monthly. He has previously written two books,
Bobos In Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There and
On Paradise Drive: How We Live Now (And Always Have) in the Future Tense.