Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - kizmet

Pages: [1]
1
Your Thoughts Exactly / Do You Know Some Manners?
« on: May 21, 2011, 02:03:21 PM »
Every week on a Saturday, I often have a date with my best friend on Skype Messenger for a few hours to exchange news. She works in one of the international MNCs in Dubai, among the beautiful destinations known today for tourists and employment seekers.

Though a nation of Arabs with Islam as her religion, Dubai employs many of our Filipino graduates, under-graduates, and even the unlettered, whether Christian, Protestants, and fellow Islam adherents.

A clean nation with disciplined inhabitants, the Filipinos however, manage to showcase their lack of manners in Dubai. Apparently, being in a highly-advanced country does not afford these individuals some etiquette, especially if they are in the company of fellow Filipinos.

Defined by the Dictionary as social comportment, Manners are supposedly implied. They are cultivated at home by our parents or elderly. These are the polite standards that constitute our character; our being. It does not take an expensive education to learn how to give deference to the existence of others or to understand the reason why.

For instance, when somebody is still sleeping when you wake up in the morning and do the necessary preparation, reasons dictate that you respect those who are still having their sleep by being discreet in your actions and words. You would not want to wake them up with your loud noise. That—is a specified rule.

Such is not the case among many Filipinos who are more concerned with their own interests like pursuing materialistic goals, often circumventing laws and doing other forms of violations. While these goals certainly improve their economic conditions, wealth and all material possessions cannot buy the owner some manners. These cannot make people humans.

In her book “Philosophy: Who Needs it?”, Ayn Rand advocates that “reason is not merely a distinguishing attribute of man. It is his fundamental attribute; his basic means of survival.”

This means that if man would only use his reasons coupled with philosophy, he can think, act, and live.

The problem with most Filipinos is that they often misuse their reasons in their endeavors. When they do their activity—whatever it is—they do so without regard to others who also own similar rights. Ironically, they dismiss the old axiom that their rights end where the rights of others begin to exist; which only supposes that our rights are never absolute.

Many Filipinos in Dubai rent a bed space for their housing accommodation, despite their high salary. Maybe it’s the expensive rental fee that keeps them from having their own private place. Or perhaps it’s the Filipino culture of wanting to be around fellow Filipinos that they’d rather huddle in a space as small as a room.

Unlike in our country, the rooms in Dubai are further subdivided  to accommodate many, and at the same time, allow each bed spacer some privacy despite being in one room with technically, six or twelve bed spacers (this holds true even in condominiums, apartments, and pads).

A few of my friends in Dubai complain of the noise from fellow Filipino bed spacers especially in the morning when they have to come-and-go out of the room, in the course of preparing to go to the office.

Also, when they engage in conversations with their fellow bed spacers late in the evening or sometimes after midnight, they talk like they own the whole room or like they are having a party. They do not consider that others who are in the same room may already want to have their rest, but cannot do so with their loud noise.

And to think that they all pay the same rental fees.

A similar thing can be said in using the Television, DVD player, and Videoke, which usually starts in the morning of Friday or Saturday [Dubai’s weekend] to late in the evening.

There are also situations where Filipinos talk to someone on their mobile phones with high  volume of voice so that everybody can have knowledge of their conversations.



If you try to confront them about it, they would apologize, yes, but this does not stop them from committing the same act. Others would claim they are just curing their loneliness or the longing for their loved ones back in the Philippines. If you persist with your complaint, they would accuse you of being insensitive, inconsiderate, and incapable of understanding because maybe, you don’t have a family or are never close to them when you were still in the Philippines or wherever.

In another scenario, despite the written reminder posted conspicuously about the house rules, many Filipinos ignore them. These range from maintaining cleanliness in the kitchen, toilet and bathroom, to using the facilities available like TV, Refrigerator, and Stove.

In “What Makes Man Truly Human” book, the author, Michael Morga said that we, humans are only considered to have reached our full humanness—and thus become truly humans—when we became aware of and learn to use our physical potentials, cognitive abilities, and human sensitivity.

Of course, to make ourselves truly humans, we should also develop these traits through many years of learning and training which start at home and continue outside during our interactions with different institutions and sectors in the world; and with fellow human beings. It is during this time when we incorporate philosophy in our lives; a time when we became acquainted with manners.

The attitude of Filipinos described earlier is not exclusive. Nor can it be said that it is the place that makes them forget their manners. In the Philippines, similar stories abound in boarding houses, apartments, dormitories, and in work places, especially, in the BPO industry.

At times, they happen even in our very own houses.

Morga stated, nevertheless, that throughout our lives, not all humans make themselves truly humans as many fail to procure the requirements of becoming one. This means that, some people, including Filipinos never learn to understand the truth about human sensitivity, particularly, in practicing manners.

This article has been published on Definitely Filipino and Kuro-Kuro.

2
Your Thoughts Exactly / On Absolutism of Rights
« on: May 16, 2011, 12:41:27 AM »
Last month, I found myself in a debate with someone who is an extreme advocate of Ayn Rand's Objectivism Philosophy. One of the topics argued about was the human rights--whether they are absolute or not. My standpoint is the non-absolutism of rights for the simple reason of having these similar and equal rights shared by all individuals within the society.

The man who advocates for absolutism of rights, asked me the question "How do I legislate his thoughts", in his attempt to persuade me that rights are indeed, absolute. Below is my response.

****

Why would I make a law to control the minds/thoughts of individuals JUST SO to comply with my notion of non-absolutism of rights? Or just so to satisfy someone? But if I were to do that, why make laws on thoughts alone? Sins or crimes are also conceived by emotions such as desires, etc.
Nevertheless, why would I do that?

My understanding of the notion “the rights are not absolute” does not cover as far as drafting/enacting a law to control the thoughts of an individual, unless, if for some reasons, the inventors in the country are able to come up with our version of “precogs”, which shall be helpful in preventing a crime.

Or if some Filipinos would suddenly procure super mental/mind powers [such as technically reading minds and thoughts] and use such powers in committing a crime, then, maybe, the government will try to convince a few of these super humans to help the government in preventing other super humans from committing a crime.  So here, the government should maintain peace and order by enacting laws. These laws shall limit the constituents from interfering with the rights of fellow citizens. “There is no crime if there is no law punishing it,” and certainly people are not accused, charged, and convicted.

When I say rights are not absolute, I mean there is/are other provision/s or law/s that would restrict/limit these rights. For example, the right to freedom of speech is limited by:
1.   Severe calumny
2.   Anything lewd or obscene
3.   Anything that provokes violence or disorder
4.   Seditious messages
5.   Clear and present danger

In Dictionary.com, the word absolute means “free from restriction or limitation; not limited in any way”. In other words, the word absolute should not have restrictions or limitations. If we apply such adjective to describe a right, it means the right should have no restrictions or limitations at all. It also means that should a person commit a murder [if there would be a murder] he or she is not convicted. To begin with, there should be no crime or charge; after all, the killing of another person is only an exercise of an absolute right. But if such notion exists in an environment, it would invite anarchy, and chaos. How about similar and equal rights of other individuals if each one has an absolute right?

So, we have to co-exist, and by co-existing means we give deference to each other’s rights. And by recognizing the rights of the others, it means limitations in our own rights. And because there is/are limitation/s, our rights become non-absolute. It is simple. And it does not have to have a law on controlling the minds/thoughts of individuals, unless, these shall create clear and present danger or shall threaten the rights of other individuals. The thoughts are an entitlement of an individual. But the moment these dangerous and life-threatening thoughts are explicitly expressed into actions, which may or will fall into a context of a crime as defined by a certain law, then that individual shall be charged, tried, and if found guilty beyond reasonable doubt after a due process, then the accused shall be convicted and punished as stipulated by laws.

Pages: [1]