Author Topic: Auxiliary verbs  (Read 8263 times)

spelling

  • Initiate
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Email
Auxiliary verbs
« on: September 06, 2014, 12:36:28 PM »
Good day,

There are 3 auxiliary verbs; do, be and have.

Am I correct that the different forms are as follow;

do - do, does, did
be - am, is, are
have - have, has, had?

Thank you.

Joe Carillo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Karma: +208/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Auxiliary verbs
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2014, 04:30:25 PM »
It’s incorrect to say that there are only three auxiliary verbs in English, namely “do,” “be,” and “have” as you’ve listed. The count actually rises to as many as 23 when we include the so-called modal auxiliaries; however, “do,” “be,” and “have” hold the distinction of being the three primary auxiliary verbs in English in the sense that they are the most commonly used.

Your listing of the different forms of the auxiliary verb “do”—“does,” “do,” and “did”—is complete.  In the case of “have,” however, the progressive-tense form “having” has to be added to make a total of four: “has,” “have,” “had,” and “having.” And for “be,” you listed only its three present-tense forms “am,” “is,” and “are”; to these must be added the past tense forms “was” and “were,” the progressive tense form “being,” and the past-participle “been,” making a total of seven forms.

Before making a complete accounting of the English auxiliary verbs, let’s agree first on a definition of the term “auxiliary verb.” A simple but instructive definition is that an auxiliary verb—also loosely called a “helping verb” or more precisely as “verbal auxiliary”—is one that enables or helps a main verb express tense, voice, emphasis, or modality. Another way of saying this is that an auxiliary verb adds functional or grammatical content to the information expressed by the main verb.

As examples, in the sentence “They did take the loot,” the verb “did” works as an intensifier for the verb “take” to emphasize that the action was, in fact, done; in the sentence “He is being fooled,” the auxiliary verb “being” works with the linking verb “is” to form the present progressive passive tense of the main verb “fooled”; and in the sentence “She has taken my share of the cake,” the auxiliary verb “has” works with the past participle “taken” to form the present perfect tense of the verb “take.”

There’s a subclass of auxiliary verbs that, unlike the three primary auxiliary verbs you listed, don’t inflect or can’t change form at all. These are the so-called modal auxiliaries, or modals for short. The most commonly used modals are “can,” “could,” “may,” “might,” “must,” “shall,” “should,” “will,” and “would”; less commonly used are the modals “dare,” “need,” and “ought.”

Functionally, a modal auxiliary or modal works with a main verb to express conditionality, necessity, obligation, ability, or wishful desire; it is unlike the typical auxiliary verb, which works with the main verb to denote voice, tense, or emphasis. In the sentence “She can speak French fluently,” for instance, the modal “can” works to convey the ability of the subject to speak French fluently. In the sentence “She does speak French fluently,” in contrast, the auxiliary verb “do” acts as an intensifier to emphasize the subject’s ability to, in fact, speak French fluently.

Keep in mind, though, that the three auxiliary verbs “be,” “do,” and “have” can also function as main verbs. For instance, in the sentence “You be the one,” the verb “be” works as a main verb to denote asking someone to assume a certain role; in “She does all the work here,” the verb “does” functions as the main verb to denote performing all the work; and in “They have lots of money,” the verb “have” works as a main verb to denote possession of lots of money.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2014, 07:11:31 PM by Joe Carillo »

John Johnson

  • Initiate
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Auxiliary verbs
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2014, 01:37:53 AM »

Is it correct to say that ‘have’ and ‘be’ are ‘lexical modals’ in ‘I have to go’ and ‘we are to leave tomorrow’?

And when we talk about ‘do’ as an intensifier in ‘I do love her’ what is it in terms of auxiliaries and full verbs? Is it an auxiliary verb or maybe a kind of modals?

Joe Carillo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Karma: +208/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Auxiliary verbs
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2014, 01:07:00 PM »
Other than the familiar grammatical modals that we know (like “can,” “could,” “may,” “might”), there are so-called lexical modals that share meanings with them. These lexical modals can be nouns (like “condition,” “decree,” “demand,” “necessity”), verbs (like “permit,”  “advise,” “intend,” “propose”), adjectives (like “likely,” “able,” “advisable,” “anxious”), or adverbs (like “hopefully,” “arguably,” “probably,” “maybe”). These lexical modals express conditionality, necessity, obligation, ability, or wishful desire, as in the sentences “The demand is for you to resign now” (modal noun “demand”), “You are permitted to leave only when the lecture ends” (modal verb “permit”), “It will likely rain today” (modal adjective “likely”), and “That movie is arguably the top box-office hit of all time” (modal adverb “arguably”).

Lexical modals are deeper and very interesting aspects of linguistics but since this Forum is for nonspecialist or lay learners of the English language, I won’t go into them beyond this perfunctory overview. Should you wish to seriously study the subject, however, check out for starters "The grammatical category of modality," a paper by Valentine Hacquard of the University of Maryland in the United States. It provides a comprehensive linguistic discussion of both grammatical and lexical modals.

Having made the above clarifications and caveat, I can now answer your three specific questions about lexical modals and intensifiers:

1. I would think that as the main verb in the sentence “I have to go,” the verb “have” would qualify as a lexical modal in that it denotes the necessity or desire to go. On the other hand, I don’t think this is the case for “are” in “We are to leave tomorrow”; in that sentence, “are” is clearly functioning only as a linking verb and doesn’t evoke a sense of modality at all.

2. I don’t think that “do” in “I do love her” is a lexical modal. As an intensifier in that sentence, “do” is just an auxiliary verb—a grammatical expletive of sorts—that doesn’t alter the lexical meaning of the statement but only enhances the emotional context of the verb “love.”
« Last Edit: September 10, 2014, 02:50:52 PM by Joe Carillo »

John Johnson

  • Initiate
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Auxiliary verbs
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2014, 01:15:53 AM »
Thanks a lot for the answer!
But I wasn't able to open the link. Is it OK?

Joe Carillo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Karma: +208/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Auxiliary verbs
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2014, 07:18:07 AM »
It's strange that your browser couldn't open the link to that PDF file. Anyway, I'll e-mail it to you right after this. I'm sure you'll find the discussion of modality in that paper an eye-opener.

Ivan Ivanov

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 37
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Auxiliary verbs
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2014, 02:02:18 PM »
Oh, thank you very much, I've got the file and begun to read it.

Now I am Ivan Ivanov  - I am sure that it sounds more Russian than John Johnson  :)

Joe Carillo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Karma: +208/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Auxiliary verbs
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2014, 02:26:47 PM »
Welcome, Ivan Ivanov! You've made a great decision in retiring your American-sounding username "John Johnson" and acknowledging that you're actually Russian. As with every other Forum member, of course, you can remain incognito and keep your privacy as you share your views and interact with others in the Forum's discussion boards. Cheers!

Ivan Ivanov

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 37
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Auxiliary verbs
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2014, 02:05:36 AM »
Thank you, and I like 'Ivan Ivanov' better too :)