Without any doubt, the adverb “no”—abetted by its semantic cousins “not,” “never,” “without,” and several others with a negative bent—is the most subversive word in the English language. Look how “no” undermines and negates every single thought and idea to which it latches on: “
No, I don’t like you.” “
No, I have never loved you.” “
No, go away; my life will be much better without you.” And if you look back at the adverbial phrase “without any doubt” that begins the first sentence above, you would see how the word “without” totally reverses the sense of “doubt” to “certainty.” Overwhelmingly powerful, “no” and its cohort can quickly and very efficiently demolish every declarative or affirmative statement that we can think up in the English language.
We can see that to negate entire statements, “no” takes a commanding position at the very beginning of sentences. It does so with brutal efficiency: “
No swerving.” “
No entry.” “
No, sir, minors aren’t allowed here.” On the other hand, when “no” has to do the negating within a sentence, it often assigns “not” to take its place, commanders an auxiliary verb, and positions “not” right after it: “The woman
drove.” “The woman
did not drive.” “The woman
will not drive.” Of course, we already know that when “not” does this, the main verb relinquishes the tense to the auxiliary verb. In the example given above, the auxiliary verb “do” takes either the past or future tense, and the main verb takes the verb stem “drive.”
The pattern of negation is slightly different in the perfect tenses. The adverb “not” simply inserts itself between the auxiliary verb and the main verb, with the main verb remaining in the past participle form even as the negation is consummated: “The woman
has driven.” “The woman
has not driven.” The important thing to remember is that “not” always positions itself between the helping verb and the main verb; for it to do otherwise would be grammatically fatal: “The woman
not has driven.” “The visitors
not have eaten.” In contrast, “never” is a movable negator, certainly much more versatile than “not.” Watch: “The woman
never drives.” “
Never does the woman
drive.” “The woman
has never driven.” “
Never has the woman
driven.” “The woman
never has driven.” “Never” is negation in its emphatic form—demolishing an idea to the extreme.
The adverb “no,” of course, can routinely negate any element by denoting absence, contradiction, denial, or refusal: “Under
no circumstances will Claudia’s offer be accepted.” “I see
no sign of reconciliation.” The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah are
no more.” “Have you
no conscience?” The adverbs “not” and “never” work in much the same way: “
Not a single drop of rain fell last summer.” “She will always be a bridesmaid,
never a bride.”
But there’s one major caveat on “not”: it’s wrong to use it in sentences that have an “all…not” form (to mean “to the degree expected”). Take this sentence: “All of the women in the district did not vote for the lone female candidate.” This sentence is semantically problematic; it could mean that “
some of the women
did not vote for the lone female candidate”, or that “
none of the women
voted for the lone female candidate.” Better to remove the ambiguity by fine-tuning the negation to yield the desired meaning. The first option: “
Not all of the women in the district
voted for the lone female candidate.” The second option: “
None of the women in the district
voted for the lone female candidate.”
The same caveat should be observed in using “not” with the adjective “every,” as in this ambiguous sentence: “
Every candidate
did not meet the voters’ expectations.” Better: “
None of the candidates
met the voters’ expectations.” “
All of the candidates
failed to meet the voters’ expectations.”
Apart from using “no,” “not,” and “never,” we can also use the lexical semantics of negation and affixal negation to reverse the sense of things.
Lexical negation is simply the negative structuring of sentences by using words with negative denotations, such as “neither,” “nor,” “rarely,” “hardly,” and “seldom.”
Affixal negation, on the other hand, negates positive words through the use of the affixes “un-”, “im-”/“in-”/“il-”, “dis-”, “de-”, and “-less,” as in “unnecessary,” “imperfect,” “ineffective,” “illegal,” “disregard,” “decamp,” and “useless.”
When using these negative affixes, of course, we must always remember to drop the “no,” “not,” or “never” in the sentence if our true intention is to negate the statement. Failure to do so will result in a grammatically incorrect double negative. “It
is not illegal to steal,” for instance, will mean exactly its opposite, “It
is legal to steal”—with all its dire consequences to civilized society.
(Next:
Excessive negation and its dangers) September 29, 2017
This essay first appeared in the column “English Plain and Simple” by Jose A. Carillo in The Manila Times
and subsequently appeared as Chapter 116 of his book Give Your English the Winning Edge
, © 2009 by the author, © 2010 by the Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.