Author Topic: "I'm the one who called you.." or " I was the one who called you.."?  (Read 7537 times)

Michael E. Galario

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 110
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Hi sir,

Just want to have clarification and confirmation about the above usage.

My understanding here is either usage is correct depending on context.

Let's say that speaker tried to call his friend last night and was not able to get hold of her. Today, he will be meeting his friend. Would it be justifiable to say,"I'm the one who called you last night." if he is trying to identify himself at the moment of speaking or should I choose the second statement, "I was the one who called you last night.", since there is a time expression used?

Can we say that the time expression only refers to the action that of the action in the wh-clause and not the whole statement?

Thanks sir.



 

« Last Edit: December 20, 2014, 09:43:05 PM by Joe Carillo »
"The only thing that's worse than not knowing how to do something is to do something wrong while believing that it's right."

Remember: We may know something but definitely not everything.

Joe Carillo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
  • Karma: +202/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: "I'm the one who called you.." or " I was the one who called you.."?
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2014, 09:59:16 PM »
What is past is past.

That, in short, should be the determining factor for tense usage in that sentence. Since the action of calling the friend was done the night before, and the speaker is identifying himself as that caller, the action of calling and the attribution for that call should necessarily be both in the past tense: “I was the one who called you last night.”

Remember that structurally, that sentence consists of two clauses, “I was the one” and “I called you last night,” combined by the relative pronoun “who” (a subordinator) into a single complex sentence. Clearly, combining the two clauses would not in any way change the tense of either of them, so it’s out of the question that the main clause would suddenly take the present tense in the alternative construction “I am the one who called you last night.” That would be grammatically absurd.

That should also answer your question about the time referent for the two concurrent actions in that complex sentence. The tense will be same for both the main clause and the relative clause—the past tense in the case at hand: “I was the one who called you last night.”

However, there’s a particular situation that, in fact, calls for the use of the present tense—in reported speech when the reporting verb is in the present tense, meaning that the speaker is making the statement right at the moment of utterance. We then can have, say, the following present-tense variations using different reporting verbs:

(1) “I tell you that I was the one who called you last night.” (simple present tense)
(2) “I’m telling you that I was the one who called you last night.” (present progressive tense)
(3) “I’m saying that I was the one who called you last night.” (present progressive tense)
(4) “What I am insisting on is that I was the one who called you last night.” (present progressive tense)

Note that in all such cases, the concurrent past tense of the reported statement—“I was the one who called you last night”—is retained. Be forewarned, however, that this is a special case that applies only to reporting verbs in the present tense. When the reporting verb is in a tense other than the present tense, the so-called normal sequence-of-tenses rule for reported speech applies. This is now a different and more complicated grammar ballgame, though, and I suggest you check out and thoroughly study the following Forum postings on reported speech to get a solid grounding on the subject:

“Going back to the basic forms of reported speech”
“How to use the normal sequence-of-tenses rule for reported speech”
“Reported speech needs advanced grammar skills and a quick mind”