Author Topic: Is it true that English has no future tense?  (Read 7624 times)

jhinx22

  • Initiate
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Is it true that English has no future tense?
« on: August 14, 2013, 12:18:48 PM »
Hello, Sir!

Our school principal has told me that there is no longer FUTURE TENSE in the English language. Please confirm this statement of hers. Thank you.

Joe Carillo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4654
  • Karma: +206/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Is it true that English has no future tense?
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2013, 02:13:45 PM »
The principal of your school is correct in a rather loose and imprecise way that the English language doesn’t have a future tense. It does have a future tense, of course; it’s just that English verbs can’t inflect or change in form for the future tense. For by some quirk in the development of the English grammar structures, verbs in English can inflect only for the past, present, and perfect tenses.



To compensate for this structural handicap, though, the English language had come up with no less than six ways of reckoning with the future. The first two are the simple future tense and the future perfect tense. As we all know, the simple future tense puts the auxiliary verb “will” ahead of the verb stem, as in “will give” in the future-tense sentence “She will give you the funds later.” On the other hand, the future perfect tense uses the so-called temporal indicators to situate actions and events in various times in the future, as in the use of the future perfect “will have given” in the following sentence: “By this time next week, she will have given me the funds she promised.” In both forms of the future tense, the verb “give”—instead of inflecting itself or changing in form—harnesses the auxiliary verb “will” or the auxiliary verb pair “will have” (plus the past participle “given”), respectively, to evoke the future.

On top of these two basic future-tense forms, English had actually come up with four more grammatical forms to convey the sense of the future. These grammatical forms evoke the future by appending to the main verb particular combinations of auxiliary verbs in different tenses. I have discussed these future-tense forms in detail in an essay of mine that I posted in the Forum on November 25, 2011 under the heading “Though very rich and diverse, English can’t inflect for the future tense.”

So go tell your teacher that it’s not really correct to say that English has no future tense. Quote me as having clarified that although English verbs are constitutionally unable to inflect for the future tense, there are actually six functional ways of making them evoke the future tense. Better still, suggest to him or her to register as a member of the Forum to get direct access to its wealth of instruction about English grammar and usage.

FURTHER READING ON THE FUTURE TENSE:
The six ways that English reckons with the future



« Last Edit: December 27, 2019, 02:21:21 PM by Joe Carillo »

Mwita Chacha

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Is it true that English has no future tense?
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2013, 03:01:01 PM »
I rarely give a compliment to anyone, but this case proves so overwhelming. I can't help praising you for the way you have cleverly turned an illegitimate question--as I have assessed it--into a logical one. When I saw the question for the first time, I thought the asker was just another teenager taking pleasure in posting insensible issues on the serious Forum.  
« Last Edit: August 15, 2013, 04:54:43 PM by Joe Carillo »

Joe Carillo

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4654
  • Karma: +206/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Is it true that English has no future tense?
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2013, 02:34:44 PM »
Thanks for the compliment! I greatly appreciate it.