The syntax of this sentence is defective and confusing:
"From children to music lovers to antique collectors, they can have a drink in the outdoor cafés here, dine in one of the restaurants, or shop in the covered shopping centres."
The pronoun "they" is improperly positioned in a way that it can't be a collective pronoun for the three antecedent subjects in the prepositional phrase upfront of the sentence. The result: that prepositional dangles and is unable to latch on to the subject "they" of the main clause.
Here's a reconstruction of that sentence that solves the problem:
"Children, music lovers, and antique collectors can have a drink in the outdoor cafés here, dine in one of the restaurants, or shop in the covered shopping centres."
Still, even in that corrected sentence, there's something iffy about the listing and the order of the kinds of customers of the commercial establishments. What's the logic of the primacy of children in that list? Why are they being listed in the same league as music lovers and antique collectors? Can't children be music lovers and antique collectors, too? Can children go to those establishments alone, without adult companions?
This is why from the available information in that sentence, it would make more sense to reconstruct it this way to address those concerns:
"Music lovers and and antique collectors can bring along their children and have a drink in the outdoor cafés here, dine in one of the restaurants, or shop in the covered shopping centres."
Sentences must not only be grammatically correct but plausible and logically airtight as well.